Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Parnell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1921No. A-4000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

The nominal petitioner in this case, Betty Parnell, the mother of Jack Parnell, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, charges that Jack Parnell, defendant, is illegally restrained of his liberty in the state penitentiary at Granite, pursuant to a commitment issued on a void judgment and conviction for the crime of larceny, rendered in the district court of Comanche county on the 17th day of February, 1921, in which the defendant was sentenced to the state penitentiary at Granite for a term of two years.

The petitioner urges that said judgment is void and of no legal effect for the reason…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re PowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Ex Parte SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Jefferson v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. In Re PatswaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Condit v. ConditSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Wheeler v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API