Rodabaugh v. Kauffman
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants Kauffman, Goldschmidt Bros., a copartnership, and Max and Herman H. Goldschmidt, individually, upon a promissory note for $5,000 executed by defendant Kauffman and upon the written guaranty of Goldschmidt Bros., a co-partnership, and Max Goldschmidt, executed by Max Goldschmidt as one of the partners and individually. Plaintiff also recovered judgment against defendant American Steel Pipe & Tank Company for $1,550, the balance found due on its written guaranty of payment to the extent of $2,500, which guaranty was executed on the same day but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hall v. JamesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tsakos Shipping & Trading, S.A. v. Juniper Garden Town Homes, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. VolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sunset Lumber Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rice Securities Co. v. DaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.