Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brion

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1994No. Appeal 62 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The controlling question in this appeal is whether, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, the police can send a confidential *257informer into the home of an individual to electronically record his conversations and transmit them back to the police. Because the right to privacy in one’s domain is sacrosanct, we hold that Article I, § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution precludes the police from sending a confidential informer into the home of an individual to electronically record his conversations and transmit them back to the police. The order of the Superior Court is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PriskSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. GlassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API