Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Eller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 2002PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

The issue on this appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in applying Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214, 736 A.2d 564 (1999), a decision in which this Court unanimously held that the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq., “provides the exclusive remedy for post-conviction claims seeking restoration of appellate rights due to counsel’s failure to perfect a direct appeal,” id. at 569-70, in a situation where appellant forwarded just such a claim, outside the framework of the PCRA and after the PCRA filing deadline expired, but before the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. CallahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API