Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge:
This case concerns the legality of a technique of electronic surveillance known as “participant monitoring,” or using a body wire to surreptitiously record a person’s conversations. The issue is whether, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, the police need a search warrant based on probable cause to send a confidential informer into the home of an individual to electronically record his conversations and transmit them back to the police. We hold that article I, section 8 of our constitution, which protects the right of the people to be secure from unreasonable…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.