Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Russo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 2007No. 135 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.*

We granted allowance of appeal in the instant case to determine whether, under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, a landowner has a reasonable expectation of privacy against enforcement of Pennsylvania’s Game Code in his open fields. Because we conclude that the Fourth Amendment open fields doctrine as enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 104 S.Ct. 1735, 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) applies equally under the Constitution of this Commonwealth, we affirm, albeit on different grounds, the order of the…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API