Legal Opinion

Carter v. Ann Arbor City Attorney

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 2006No. Docket 258282PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtServitto, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right a circuit court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant and denying plaintiffs motion for summary disposition in this veterans’ preference act case. Because plaintiff failed to demonstrate his ability to perform the job of assistant city attorney at the level of skill and with the expertise required by the employer, the veterans’ preference act did not grant him preference in public service employment, and we therefore affirm.

In response to a notice of job vacancies, plaintiff applied for a position as assistant city attorney for the city of Ann…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Coalition for a Safer Detroit v. Detroit City ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. City of Bay City v. Bay County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API