Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. Woolner
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1931No. Docket Nos. 7694, 7695PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
By stipulation the appeals in these two actions have been submitted upon one set of briefs. The issues and findings in both cases are practically identical and it will only be necessary in this opinion to consider the appeal in the action numbered in this court 7694.
Appellant Woolner is the owner in fee of certain land upon which is located a producing oil-well. This well was originally leased by appellant to Federal Drilling Company for a period of twenty years with a covenant against assignment without the written consent of the lessor. The lease was subsequently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tuck v. GudnasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Universal Pictures Corp. v. Roy Davidge Film Laboratory, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Wilson v. GreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Tinker v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958