Anderson v. Hubble
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— It is alleged in the first paragraph of the appellee’s complaint, that the appellant, without right, increased the height of a dam across the Elkhart river, and thereby flooded her land. In the second paragraph a like allegation is mack;, and it is also charged that the land of the appellee was rendered useless, and that the stagnant water caused an injury to the public health and comfort. It is not necessary to give a more extended synopsis of the complaint as no question is made upon it.
*572We think the Third paragraph of the answer did not set forth any facts not admissible under other…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Wendell v. Van RensselaerNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.