Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Grey
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1942No. Civ. 11265PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment refusing to set aside a conveyance from defendant Arthur L. Grey to defendant Hazel A. Grey, his wife, and to subject such property to the satisfaction of a judgment theretofore recovered against defendant Arthur L. Gray.
The complaint alleged the recovery of the judgment in the sum of $5000, the failure to satisfy it except to the extent of $56.18, and that after the indebtedness was incurred the defendant Arthur L. Grey on or about July 3, 1933, had conveyed the property to his wife without consideration and for the purpose of preventing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- First Nat'l Fin. Corp. v. Five-O Drilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hedlund v. Sutter Medical Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Fanning v. Yoland Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- COLLETT v. GoodrichUtah Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.