Legal Opinion

Phillips v. BUTTERBALL FARMS CO. INC.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1993No. Docket 165049PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON SECOND REMAND

Before: McDonald, P.J., and Reilly and Jansen, JJ. Reilly, J.

This case has been remanded again, this time for reconsideration in light of Dunbar v Dep’t of Mental Health, 197 Mich App 1; 495 NW2d 152 (1992), a case decided after our last opinion was released. Our previous opinions in this matter have been vacated and, therefore, we are bound by Administrative Order No. 1990-6, as extended, to follow Dunbar. Accordingly, we reverse.

i

In our original opinion on remand, we considered whether the trial court properly dismissed plaintiffs claim for damages for mental anguish,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Trombetta v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Butterball Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brocklehurst v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Phillips v. Butterball Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API