Legal Opinion
Brocklehurst v. PPG Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 26, 1994No. 2:92-cv-76429PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR NEW TRIAL BUT GRANTING REMITTITUR
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff sued Defendant for wrongful discharge and age discrimination in violation of Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. Plaintiffs suit arose from his termination of employment as the marketing director of PPG’s team serving Ford Motor Company on January 3,1992. He was 48 years old at the time that he lost his job at PPG. On July 23, 1993, Defendant moved for summary judgment, which this Court granted as to the wrongful…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Joseph Dominic, Cross-Appellant v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Gerald C. Bruner, Cross-Appellant v. Wade Dunaway, Cross-Appellees, James Bates, Gregory Taylor, Christian CastellawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Brocklehurst v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 984, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,149 Karl D. Brocklehurst, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997