Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
At issue in this appeal is whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment as to the plaintiffs claim that his discharge from his employment with Michigan Consolidated Gas Company was improper as contrary to public policy. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for the defendant. We agree that summary judgment was appropriate and affirm.
I
The plaintiff began working for Michigan Consolidated Gas Company in September, 1972, as a senior auditor. He was discharged in January, 1976, and brought this action in 1978, stating various theories of recovery in a six-count complaint. Only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Derrick E. Harper v. Autoalliance International, Inc., Aai Employee Services Co., L.L.C., Jeffrey Kelly, and Allen ChildressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Sandra Humenny v. Genex Corporation, Inc. Carol ValenticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.