Legal Opinion
Barth v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 9, 1992No. 474-87CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
FUTEY, Judge.
This military-pay and reinstatement case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a former first lieutenant in the Air Force, alleges that defendant acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied, without a hearing, plaintiff’s application for reinstatement. Plaintiff requests back pay, costs and attorney’s fees. In addition, plaintiff asks that this court order the Air Force to expunge from plaintiff’s records all documents relating to her dismissal.
On its cross-motion for summary judgment, defendant maintains that plaintiff cannot…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlisle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Wells ex rel. Wells v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Barth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Cole v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Schwartz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992