Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 22, 2005No. 03-25CPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
In this military pay case, the plaintiff was involuntarily separated from the Army, but later was reinstated after he successfully applied for correction of his military records. He claims that, upon his reinstatement and subsequent retirement, various errors were committed in determining his back pay and veterans benefits. Defendant has moved to dismiss this ease and, alternatively, seeks judgment on the administrative record. In response, plaintiff has filed a cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record.
I. FACTS
By way of background, the relevant facts in…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.