Legal Opinion

Edge Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 29, 2010No. 06-635CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DAMICH, Judge.

This government construction contract ease is before the court on the Government’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Edge Construction Company (“Edge” or “the Plaintiff’) alleges that the Government breached its contract by denying Edge’s claims for additional costs and extensions of time and improperly terminated the contract for default. The Government contends that the Contracting Officer properly denied Edge’s claims and was justified in terminating the contract for default.

Edge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. SNC-Lavalin America, Inc. v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
  5. Grand Enterprises, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API