Legal Opinion

City of Stockton v. Marengo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1934No. Civ. No. 4983PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Both parties to this action in eminent domain have appealed from a judgment for damages which was entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury rendered incident to the condemnation of a strip of land beyond the limit of the City of Stockton, to be used as an extension of Washington Street therein.

The tract through which the proposed street is to be extended consists of several acres of land used by the defendants for the purpose of farming, except that the defendants’ land has been platted and three lots have been sold therefrom with reference to the map which is on file. The northerly portion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. GianniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Wolff v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Muse v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API