Legal Opinion
146 Dundas Corp. v. Chemical Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided August 10, 1987PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
This case raises the question whether a mortgage foreclosure sale of three parcels of property to the second highest bidder is valid if the term permitting the second highest bidder to purchase the property, if the highest bidder defaulted, is announced orally at the sale but was not included in the published notice of the sale. The plaintiffs are 146 Dundas Corporation (Dundas), the mortgagor of the property, and Timothy J. Sheehan, III, 3 the defaulting bidder at the foreclosure sale. The defendants are Chemical Bank, the mortgagee of the property; Edward C. Maher, the second highest bidder…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. PetersenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- West Roxbury Co-operative Bank v. BowserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Model Lodging House Ass'n v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- States Resources Corp. v. Architectural Team, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Molly A. v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- FANEUIL INVESTORS GROUP, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Board of Selectmen of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Hamel v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.