Hamel v. Board of Health
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
As part of a plan to protect the drinking water supply of the Katama section of Edgartown from contamination, that town’s board of health (board), acting under authority conferred by G. L. c. Ill, § 31, adopted a regulation prohibiting the construction of guesthouses in the affected area. Paul G. Hamel and Carolyn Hamel own a four-bedroom house located on a two-acre lot that is subject to the board’s regulation. They wish to construct a two-bedroom guesthouse with its own septic system and brought a complaint in Superior Court for a declaration that the “no guesthouses” regulation was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Collura v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Whitehouse v. Town of SherbornMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- United Reis Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tri-Nel Management, Inc. v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Fafard v. Conservation Commission of ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- American Lithuanian Naturalization Club, Athol, Mass., Inc. v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Padden v. West BoylstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- RYO Cigar Ass'n v. Boston Public Health CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.