Legal Opinion
Road Supply & Metal Co. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 12, 1926No. 26,757PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
The board of commissioners of Sedgwick county entered into a contract with Frank Bechtelheimer for the construction of a road. The mechanic’s-lien act provides that in such case the contractor shall give a bond running to the state, to be filed with the clerk of the'district court, conditioned for the payment of all indebtedness incurred for labor and material furnished. (R. S. GO-1413, 60-1414.) The contractor gave an undertaking, running to *300the county (which was not filed with the clerk of the court), signed by a bonding company, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Algonite Stone Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. Dudley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. McQueen Smith Farming Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Cooke v. LuscombeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Southwestern Electrical Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- William S. Van Clief & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.