Legal Opinion

Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. Dudley Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1920No. 22,556; No. 22,557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

These actions were commenced by materialmen, to recover on a bond furnished by a contractor, who contracted to make street improvements in the city of Stillwater, Okla. The plaintiffs recovered, and the surety on the bond appeals.

The statute of the state of Oklahoma relating to cities requires the mayor and council of a city about to let a contract for street work to adopt a resolution of the following character:

“Said resolution shall set forth any such reasonable terms and conditions as the mayor and council shall deem proper to impose with…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Swaller v. Williamson Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Road Supply & Metal Co. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Lefebure v. Henry Lefebure Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API