Legal Opinion
William S. Van Clief & Sons, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
In 1928 the city of New York contracted with the Paulsen Construction Corporation for the construction of a sewerage system. Plaintiff, a materialman, furnished to the Paulsen Construction Corporation materials which were used in the work. For these materials it has not been paid. In compliance with the ordinance (New York Code of Ordinances,' chap. 2, art. 2, § 72), the city, prior to the commencement of the work, exacted a bond executed by the defendant surety companies, conditioned for the faithful performance of all the terms of the contract by the defendant Paulsen Construction…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Simson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fleischer v. W. P. I. X. Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Hanover Insurance Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Graybar Electric Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- American State Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Cappello v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.