Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 13, 1996No. 94-9247PublishedCited by 452 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
This case presents the question whether a district court has authority to grant a postverdict motion for judgment of *418acquittal filed one day outside the time limit prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c).
I
Petitioner Charles Carlisle, along with several co-defendants, was tried by jury in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U. S. C. §§ 841, 846, 84 Stat. 1260, 1265. He did not move during the trial for a judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by452 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
447 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.