Legal Opinion

Weiss v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1994No. 92-1482PublishedCited by 299 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

We must decide in these cases whether the current method of appointing military judges violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, and whether the lack of a fixed term of office for military judges violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. We conclude that neither constitutional provision is violated.

Petitioner Weiss, a United States Marine, pleaded guilty at a special court-martial to one count of larceny, in violation of Article 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ or Code), 10 U. S. C. § 921. He was sentenced to three months of confinement, partial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by299 opinions

  1. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994

294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API