United States v. Denedo
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The case before us presents a single issue: whether an Article I military appellate court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of error coram nobis to challenge its earlier, and final, decision affirming a criminal conviction. The military court which had affirmed the conviction and where the writ of coram nobis was sought is the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (NMCCA). Its ruling that it had jurisdiction to grant the writ, but then denying its issuance for lack of merit, was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF). After the CAAF…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by303 opinions
- Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Wall v. KholiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Temitope AkinsadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Fany Ramirez-Mejia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.