Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Gardiner Hill Timber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligent operation of a saw mill, brought by Ishum Arnold, as plaintiff, against Gardiner Hill Timber Company, a corporation, as ■ defendant. The ease was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff prosecuted his action under two theories of recovery; viz.: (1) common-law negligence, and (2) violation of the Employers’ Liability Act ($§ 102-1601 to 102-1606, OCLA). The trial court submitted both theories to the jury.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Nichols v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Baldassarre v. West Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Varley v. Consolidated Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Maercklein v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company, and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API