Legal Opinion

Varley v. Consolidated Timber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.

The plaintiff, Edith M. Varley, has appealed from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Consolidated Timber Company, pursuant to chapter 309, Oregon Laws 1941, notwithstanding verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

After both parties to the litigation had rested the case the defendant moved for a directed verdict in its favor, on the ground that the plaintiff was, at the time she was injured, a trespasser or a bare licensee on the right of way of the defendant company and that there was no evidence that she was injured by a wilful or wanton act of the defendant, and on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Sarlls v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API