Legal Opinion

Maercklein v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1954No. 17031PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court where judgment was entered against them in g substantial amount. Both are physicians and surgeons regularly licensed to practice their profession in the State of Colorado and were so engaged at the time of the events hereinafter related.

In his complaint 'plaintiff alleged that on or about De*74cember 1, 1949, he consulted the defendant Maercklein who advised him that he was then in need of a circumcision; that plaintiff again consulted Maercklein (he testified that this was about two weeks prior to June 23, 1950) “and it was agreed that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Barnhoff v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. McClees v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Physicians' & Dentists' Business Bureau v. DrayWashington Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Bloskas v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API