Legal Opinion
William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company, and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood Division
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 23, 1992No. 92-3015PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
William Rolick instituted this diversity action against two Oregon corporations, Collins Pine Company, and Collins Pine Company, t/d/b/a as Kane Hardwood Division. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1988).
This court has jurisdiction of Rolick’s appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988).
I. FACTS
Kane Hardwood Division (hereinafter referred to as “Kane” or collectively with Collins Pine Company as “defendants”) contracted with the United States Forest Service for the timber rights to certain tracts of land, including Turkey…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Savarese v. AgrissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Richard J. Teal and Tina Teal v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Anthony J. Melerine, Jr., Continental Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Vickie Thorne v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & JackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.