Legal Opinion
In Re Matthew F.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 2010No. SC 18583PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The department of children and families (department) appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion for services filed by the petitioner, Matthew F., which required the department to, inter aha, provide and pay for appropriate private placement services for Matthew, who had been committed to the department’s care prior to his eighteenth birthday, until he attains the age of twenty-one.1 The department’s principal claim on appeal is that the Superior Court for Juvenile Matters lacked jurisdiction over the motion because it was filed after Matthew had attained the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Castonguay v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Kaddah v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.