Legal Opinion
National Advertising Co. v. Murray City Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 24, 2006No. 20050110-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
¶ 1 Plaintiff National Advertising Company (NAC) appeals the trial court’s grant of Defendants 1 Gene and Sherry Crawfords’ (the Crawfords) postjudgment motion for leave to file a second amended answer and counterclaim (Motion for Leave to Amend). NAC contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant the Crawfords’ Motion for Leave to Amend. NAC also appeals the trial court’s order finding that NAC breached its lease with the Crawfords and the Crawfords are eligible for damages resulting from such breach. We reverse, concluding the trial court lacked jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ahmed v. DragovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Elnora Camp, as Administrator of the Estate of Anthony Young, Deceased v. George GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Transit Casualty Company, Etc. v. Security Trust Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pang v. International Document ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Wittingham LLC v. TNE Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Kappos v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024