Legal Opinion

State Farm Lloyds v. Geeslin

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 22, 2008No. 03-05-00524-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, State Farm Lloyds appeals an enforcement action initiated by the Texas Department of Insurance (“TDI” or the “department”). 1 Purporting to exercise its general enforcement authority under article 1.02 and chapters 82 and 84 of the insurance code, TDI initiated enforcement action against State Farm Lloyds, seeking (1) to prevent State Farm Lloyds from charging its current rates, which, according to TDI, were excessive; (2) to require State Farm Lloyds to pay restitution to affected policyholders; and (3) to impose sanctions on State Farm…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. Jackson v. State Office of Administrative Hearings, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  3. State Farm Lloyds v. RathgeberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Levi Barriere v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. Samuel T. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API