Legal Opinion

Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2003No. 02-0485PublishedCited by 3,054 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wainwright

In this insurance coverage dispute, we construe the definition of total disability found in two insurance policies. Interpreting the policies as they are written, we hold that an insured is totally disabled when he is unable to perform all of the important and usual duties of his occupation. Because the insured in this case was able to perform some of the important and usual duties of his occupation as a physician, he was not totally disabled under the policies’ terms. We also conclude that the insured’s extra-contractual claims are barred by limitations. The trial court was correct in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,054 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005

3,049 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API