Legal Opinion

FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 98-0685PublishedCited by 1,426 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice Hankinson, Justice O’NEILL and Justice GONZALES joined.

The primary issue in this direct appeal is whether section 26.179 of the Texas Water Code, which allows certain private landowners to create “water quality protection zones” in certain cities’ extraterritorial jurisdictions, violates the Texas Constitution. We conclude that it does because it unconstitutionally delegates legislative power to private landowners. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s judgment on the merits as well as on attorney’s fees.

I. BACKGROUND

The Texas…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,426 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Patient Advocates of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2004

1,421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API