Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wainwright
In this case we construe the meaning of certain notice provisions of a commonly used oil and gás operating agreement. Working interest owner Elmagene Dorsett sued Valence Operating Company in a dispute arising from a joint operating agreement. The trial court granted partial summary judgment against Dorsett on her breach of contract claims, finding that Dorsett failed to consent to participate in the wells at issue, and that a contractual non-consent penalty for that failure was enforceable against her. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment in favor of Dorsett, holding that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,472 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- Intercontinental Group Partnership v. KB Home Lone Star L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Epps v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 2011
3,467 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.