Legal Opinion

City of Rockwall v. Hughes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 05-0126PublishedCited by 1,052 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, and Justice GREEN joined.

A municipality generally must annex land pursuant to a plan giving three years’ notice of its intent to annex. If an area is exempt from the three-year notice requirement, then annexation can take place by use of abbreviated procedures with less notice of a city’s intent to annex.

In this case, a landowner sought inclusion in the City of Rockwall’s three-year annexation plan. The City denied the request, claimed the proposed annexation was statutorily exempt from the three-year requirement, and gave…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,052 opinions

  1. Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. ChathaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Youngkin v. HinesTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Galbraith Engineering Consultants, Inc. v. PochuchaTexas Supreme Court · 2009

1,047 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API