Legal Opinion
Thrasher v. Bear
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 11, 1940No. 3 Div. 314PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal from the decree of the circuit court challenges the construction of written instruments for the platting and conveyance of urban lands.
The evidence is written and there is no presumption of the correctness, of the decree of the lower court, and the same will be so considered. McDermott v. Halliburton, 220 Ala. 553, 126 So. 854; Montgomery v. McNutt, 214 Ala. 692, 108 So. 752.
It has been decided by this court that if there are violations of the restrictions contained in an urban plat that the right thereunder may be protected and enjoined against such violation.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Virgin v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McKee v. Club-View Heights, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allen v. AxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Flamingo Ranch Est., Inc. v. Sunshine Ranches H., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Levitt Homes, Inc. v. Old Farm Homeowners' Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Willis v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Hall v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.