Legal Opinion
Virgin v. Garrett
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 18, 1936No. 3 Div. 177PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The purpose of this suit is to enjoin the erection of a filling station or other structure, except a residence upon a lot in Montgomery which adjoins one owned by complainant. The property in question is situated in Cloverdale, and that of appellant, who was respondent to the bill, is on the northeast corner of the intersection of Cloverdale road (now called) and Fairview avenue.
It is not a part of the property involved in South Cloverdale, lying south of Fair-view avenue, and considered in Scheuer v. Britt, 218 Ala. 270, 118 So. 658.
Cloverdale, lying north of Fairview, was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dennis v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- McMahon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Sharp v. RopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Allen v. AxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Reetz v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Rowe v. MayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Andrews v. Metropolitan Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.