Legal Opinion

Willis v. Buchman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1940No. 3 Div. 319PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The holdings of this court and of the Court of Appeals are to the effect that appeals may be dismissed where the questions for decision have become moo.t. Alabama Power Co. v. City of Sheffield, 232 Ala. 53, 166 So. 797; Todd v. Moore, 205 Ala. 451, 88 So. 447; Caldwell v. Loveless, 17 Ala.App. 381, 85 So. 307.

In this case there was an appeal under the statute and in Agricola Furnace Company v. Smith, Ala.Sup., 195 So. 743, 1 there was petition for certiorari, and this decision dpes not determine the question pre- ' sented in the Court of Appeals on the motion to dismiss the appeal and sought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. LovelessAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Todd v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Thrasher v. BearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. City of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Karagan v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Grant v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Francis v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API