Legal Opinion

Scheuer v. Britt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1928No. 3 Div. 823PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOÜLDIN, J.

The bill is to enjoin the erection of a store building and filling station within an area alleged to be restricted to residences only; The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers to the amended bill.

The bill shows complainant is the owner of described lots as shown by recorded plot of South Cloverdale, and respondent the owner of lots in the same plat opposite, and across the street from the property of complainant.

The averments upon which the equity of the bill is rested are these:

“That Mamie D. Jones was originally the owner of the property described in said plat; that she…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sprague v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. McMahon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Allen v. BrombergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Wilson Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Brown v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Grange v. KorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API