Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. Western Gas Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1913No. Civ. No. 1164PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Frank F. Oster, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered through the negligence of appellant. As to the second defendant named, judgment of nonsuit was granted and as to which no complaint is made upon this appeal. The jury sitting at the trial of the action returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the principal sum of $10,875, upon which verdict judgment was entered. This appeal is taken from the judgment and from an order denying the motion of appellant for a new trial.

Prior to the twenty-fifth day of January, 1910, appellant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Varas v. Barco Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Wiezorek v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API