Legal Opinion

Franklin Enterprises Corp. v. King Refrigerator Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGolden, J.

Motion to dismiss an amended complaint for legal insufficiency.

Plaintiff alleges, in substance, that it and other dealers market automatic home freezers, often selling them under conditional sales contracts. Prior to October 10,1954, certain of those other dealers offered to pay plaintiff commissions for financing their conditional sales contracts. Thereafter and on or about that *958date plaintiff informed Consumer’s Time Credit, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Consumer’s) of the offers plaintiff had received from those dealers and entered into negotiations with Consumer’s for an agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Keviczky v. LorberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Portman v. BurackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API