Legal Opinion

Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

We have examined this record with a great deal of care to see, if possible, wherein the defendants did the plaintiff injury for which the law gives redress. The eminence and ability of counsel, the size of the verdict and the desire to afford equal opportunity to business competitors have caused us to look for that angle from which we could catch a view of that unfair practice claimed by the plaintiff. We have looked in vain.

The subject-matter of this litigation is the contract or lease for the advertising space in the cars and upon the platforms of the Boston Elevated Railway. Henry…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. May v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Morgan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Debnam v. SimonsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API