Legal Opinion

Portman v. Burack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint does not contain facts sufficient to show that, if defendants had not interfered, plaintiff would have earned a commission. (Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, 263 N. Y. 386, 401.) The words “that the plaintiff’s negotiations proceeded to a point where a contract of sale would probably have resulted, except for the conduct of the defendants, hereinafter described” are not sufficient even if the word “ probably ” had been omitted. They are merely a statement of a conclusion. If facts were stated showing that negotiations between plaintiff and defendants had reached a stage as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams & Co. v. Collins Tuttle & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Newberry & Co. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Dinkin v. RaporteNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Franklin Enterprises Corp. v. King Refrigerator Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kaulhausen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API