Portman v. Burack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The complaint does not contain facts sufficient to show that, if defendants had not interfered, plaintiff would have earned a commission. (Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, 263 N. Y. 386, 401.) The words “that the plaintiff’s negotiations proceeded to a point where a contract of sale would probably have resulted, except for the conduct of the defendants, hereinafter described” are not sufficient even if the word “ probably ” had been omitted. They are merely a statement of a conclusion. If facts were stated showing that negotiations between plaintiff and defendants had reached a stage as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams & Co. v. Collins Tuttle & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Newberry & Co. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Dinkin v. RaporteNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Franklin Enterprises Corp. v. King Refrigerator Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Kaulhausen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.