Keviczky v. Lorber

Whether plaintiff has made out a cause of action sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury, that the buyer and seller and so-called dummy broker have conspired wrongfully to refrain from dealing with plaintiff and thus prevented him from earning his commission, is the question presented by this appeal.

In view of the findings of the jury, plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable view of the evidence, including the reasonable inferences therefrom.

The dramatis persones are plaintiff, a real estate broker, and defendants-appellants, a savings bank and one Lorber, a purchaser of real…