Legal Opinion
In Re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 4, 2009No. Case 1:08-wp-65000PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. No. 21]
JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.
Defendant Whirlpool Corporation moves this Court to dismiss a number of claims in the Plaintiffs’ Master Class Action Complaint. [Doc. 21.] The Plaintiffs oppose the motion. [Doc. 36.] While the Defendant’s motion to dismiss was pending, this Court granted the Plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Master Class Action Complaint (“MCAC”), which the Plaintiffs filed on September 25, 2009. 1 [Doc. 66.] The Court’s analysis considers the Defendant’s motion to dismiss as it applies to the newly-amended MCAC.
In this…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Ehrlich v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.