Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Stratton

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1902No. 2021PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso Comity.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

Walter F. Crosby brongbt tbis snit against Win-field S. Stratton to recover damages from tbe latter for tbe alleged wrongful conversion by bim of stock *214in The Portland Mining Company, to which the former averred himself to be entitled. The complaint set forth as follows: That the entire capital stock of The Portland Mining Company, a corporation consisting of 3,000,000 shares of the par value of one dollar each, was, at the date of the organization of the company, issued, fully paid and non-assessable, in consideration of certain mining property then conveyed to the corporation; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. McAllister v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. State ex rel. Page v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  5. Dousman v. Wisconsin & Lake Superior Mining & Smelting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  2. Borg v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Dunn v. Acme Auto & Garage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Lininger Implement Co. v. Queen City Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Runswick v. FloorUtah Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API