Legal Opinion

Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. Tabor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Lake County. Two suits, in the nature of actions in trover, brought by Horace A. W. Tabor, David H. Moffatt, Jacob J. B. Du Bois, James G. Blaine and Jerome B. Chaffee, — ■ the first against Eddy, James and Grant; the second against the Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Company, in which it appears the business of the former defendants was merged. ■ Plaintiffs alleged that they, with Charles E. Rider, were the owners and in the possession of the…

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court of Lake County. Two suits, in the nature of actions in trover, brought by Horace A. W. Tabor, David H. Moffatt, Jacob J. B. Du Bois, James G. Blaine and Jerome B. Chaffee, — ■ the first against Eddy, James and Grant; the second against the Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Company, in which it appears the business of the former defendants was merged. ■ Plaintiffs alleged that they, with Charles E. Rider, were the owners and in the possession of the mine in the county of Lake known as the “Maid of Ei’in Lode,” and as survey “Lot No. 568,” and “Mineral Entry No. 384,”…

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, O.

The first fifteen and the eighteenth errors assigned are to the ruling of the court on the cross-examination of plaintiffs’ witness O. H. Harker.

Counsel in their argument for appellants say: “ The defendants sought to show by cross-examination of the plaintiffs’ witnesses that at the time of the commission of the trespasses complainéd of, the Maid of Erin mine was owned by the Henriett Mining & Smelting Company and J. B. DuBois, and that the original trespassers wére enjoined at the suit of these parties by proper proceedings, instituted for that purpose, but they were not permitted…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Hutchings v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  5. Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API