Legal Opinion
Borg v. International Silver Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 4, 1925No. 372PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
We do not see how it can be thought that the shares in question were in fact retired. The New Jersey statute (section 27, N. J. Corporation Law [P. L. 1896, p. 277]), prescribed a method by which this could be done, and there was no pretense of following it. As between the state and the defendant, the shares were certainly not retired. Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. Law, 583, 65 A. 913, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 885. We shall for argument’s sake assume, without deciding, that the defendant might have so conducted itself as to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Elliott v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Luther v. C. J. Luther Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- German-American Coffee Co. v. . DiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- State ex rel. Page v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Wall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Kirschenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Atterbury v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.