Legal Opinion

Herman Blankenship v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of State, Benson A. Wolman, Intervenors-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2005No. 04-4259PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants are five Ohio residents who served as members of a committee to qualify Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo (hereinafter, “Nader”) as independent joint candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States on the Ohio ballot in the election of 2004. They appeal the dismissal of their claim for a declaratory judgment, in which they asked that Ohio’s law requiring circulators of nominating petitions to be residents of, and registered voters in, the state of Ohio, be declared in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ralph Nader v. John KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Committee for the Referendum v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Blankenship v. BlackwellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nader v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Ophelia Ford v. John S. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Ford v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Nader v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API